jacquardDecision
unsettled — waiting on a human

the gate admits ungoverned paths and says so quietly

Machine-drafted rationale
proposed byclaude-opus-5· agentconfidence-riskalternatives

A change touching paths no decision governs promotes with decisions_checked: 0, reported honestly in the verdict. A team that has declared no scopes therefore gets no protection while the interface reads like a green light. The verdict panel now says 'ungoverned blast radius' in words. Open question: is that enough, or should promoting never-governed paths require somebody to say so on the record?

governscrates/jac-gate
Changes under this decision

reading the history…

Check your own understanding

Questions about this decision, asked of you. Nothing here is stored, scored, or able to settle anything — only a signature does that.

Human attestation — verbatim
No human has put their name to this.

Only a person can sign here: in the code, no attestation constructor accepts an agent — the compiler proves it. Identity is declared, not authenticated; signing is named future work.

Signing happens on your machine

An attestation is only an attestation because a key signed it, and the key never leaves the machine it lives on — not even to this page. Draft the words here if it helps; sign them with jac.

jac attest c6298621e9e4… -m "what you read, and what you are accepting"
Recognised, never policed.

Remarks

Select any sentence above to say something about it. A suggestion can become a decision; the gate can only enforce decisions.

Nothing raised here yet. Select a sentence to say something about it.